Usefulness Of Financial Information Towards Using Financial Statements Finance Essay - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 9 Words: 2562 Downloads: 9 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Finance Essay Type Research paper Did you like this example? Financial statements are the statements that show the performance of an individuals, a business or an organizations financial position or status. Basically there are four types of financial statements that include Balance Sheet, Income Statement, Cash Flow Statement and Statement of Retained Profits or Earnings. Users of financial statements can be divided into two following categories Internal Users External Users Internal Users Internal users are the users related with the management of concern for which information is required to be collected or surveyed. They are Managers, Employees, Directors and Partners of the business. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Usefulness Of Financial Information Towards Using Financial Statements Finance Essay" essay for you Create order Managers and Owners Managers, directors and owners needed the financial statements to make business decisions. They are considered essential for the smooth flow of business operations. They set outs the current and actual financial position of the business and the future of the business can be sought on basis of past financial statements. Sometimes it becomes very difficult to choose or decide the right path for the business in which financial resources may be channelized. In such case financial statements financial statements of competitors or other companies provide suitable guideline. Employees The immense usage of the financial statements is to the employees of the business to collective bargain agreements. These statements are used to discuss matters of promotion, salary or rankings alike. External Users External users of financial statements are as follows Investors Investors Suppliers Customers Competitors Government agencies Public Investors Investors use financial statements to make decisions to invest into a business. Investors are always keen to make their investment safe and secure. Investors always needed to know that how their investment i.e. money being spent by the managers. Lenders Lenders supply or provide finance to the business on agreed rate of interest for shorter or longer period of time. Suppliers In a business commodities are sold and purchase on credit basis. Suppliers provide goods and services to business on credit basis. The suppliers always use financial statement to assure by analyzing financial statements that the business to whom they ate supplying goods and services on credit have the ability to repay the price of goods and services provided. Customer Customers are also user of financial statements of a business. Here question arises Why do customer need financial statements of a business? The answer is customers want to know that either the business whose goods and services they are going to use or utilize have enough resources to lend them. Competitors Competitors are also users of financial statements of the business to know the financial situation of the business to make decisions and strategies to conquer the market. New entrants needed likelihood to get into the market. Government Agencies Government agencies and legislation authorities also interested into the financial statements of the business for the purpose of legislation, taxation, regulation of labor and permission of license etc. General Public For members of the public the financial statement of the business is of the nature of a health examination report. It tells the public about employment opportunities and general growth of an individual concern and an economy as a whole. Evaluate the performance of a company of your choice with an organisation trading within the same industry. (Use appropriate ratios. Attach the copy of the financial statements of both companies Accounting Ratios for Nokia Corporation Ltd For the year 2008 Liquidity Ratios: Current Ratio: Current Assets / Current Liabilities X 100 24470 / 20355 X 100 120% Absolute Liquid Ratio: Cash + cash Equivalents / Current Liabilities X 100 6820 / 20355 X 100 33.5% Quick (Acid Test) Ratio: Current Assets inventories / Current Liabilities X 100 21937 / 20335 X 100 107.8% Profitability Ratios: GP Margin Ratio: Sales CGS / Sales X 100 17373 / 50710 X 100 34.26% Net Profit to Net Sales Ratio: Net Profit / Net Sales X 100 4970 / 50710 X100 9.8% Earnings Per Share Ratio: Net Profit Payable / Number of shares 3988 / 1000 3.988 Per share Solvency (Coverage) Ratios: Debt to Total Asset Ratio: Total Debts / Total Assets X 100 20355 / 39582 X 100 51.42% Activity Ratios: Primary Activity Ratios: Debtor Turnover Ratio: Net credit sales / Avg. Debtors 50710 / 10322 4.91 Note: All the sales are assumed as credit sales Inventory Turnover Ratio: CGS / Avg. Inventory 33337 / 2704.5 12.32 Asset turnover Ratio: Sales / avg. total assets 50710 / 241670.5 0.21 Supplementary Activity Ratios: Avg. Collection Period: 365 / Debtors turnover ratio 365 / 4.91 74.33 days Inventory Conversion Period: 365 / Inventory turnover ratio 365 / 12.32 29.62 ~ 30 days Accounting Ratios for Nokia Corporation Ltd For the year 2007 Liquidity Ratios: Current Ratio: Current Assets / Current Liabilities X 100 29294 / 18976 X 100 154.37% Absolute Liquid Ratio: Cash + Cash Equivalents / Current Liabilities X 100 6850 / 18976 X 100 36.1% Quick (Acid Test) Ratio: Current Assets inventories / Current Liabilities X 100 26418 / 18976 X 100 139.23% Profitability Ratios: GP Margin Ratio: Sales CGS / Sales X 100 17304 / 51058 X 100 33.9% Net Profit to Net Sales Ratio: Net Profit / Net Sales X 100 8268 / 51058 X100 16.2% Earnings Per Share Ratio: Net Profit Payable / Number of shares 8268 / 1000 8.268 Per share Solvency (Coverage) Ratios: Debt to Total Asset Ratio: Total Debts / Total Assets X 100 18976 / 37599 X 100 50.47% Activity Ratios: Primary Activity Ratios: Debtor Turnover Ratio: Net credit sales / Avg. Debtors 51058 / 8544 5.97 Note: All the sales are assumed as credit sales Inventory Turnover Ratio: CGS / Avg. Inventory 33754 / 2210 15.27 Asset turnover Ratio: Sales / avg. total assets 51058 / 30108 1.7 Supplementary Activity Ratios: Avg. Collection Period: 365 / Debtors turnover ratio 365 / 5.97 61.13 days Inventory Conversion Period: 365 / Inventory turnover ratio 365 / 15.27 23.9 ~ 24 days Accounting Ratios for Nokia Corporation Ltd For the year 2006 Liquidity Ratios: Current Ratio: Current Assets / Current Liabilities X 100 18586 / 10161 X 100 182.9% Absolute Liquid Ratio: Cash + Cash Equivalents / Current Liabilities X 100 8537 / 10161 X 100 84.02% Quick (Acid Test) Ratio: Current Assets inventories / Current Liabilities X 100 17029 / 10161 X 100 167.62% Profitability Ratios: GP Margin Ratio: Sales CGS / Sales X 100 13379 / 41121 X 100 32.54% Net Profit to Net Sales Ratio: Net Profit / Net Sales X 100 5723 / 41121 X100 13.92% Earnings Per Share Ratio: Net Profit Payable / Number of shares 4366 / 1000 4.366 Per share Solvency (Coverage) Ratios: Debt to Total Asset Ratio: Total Debts / Total Assets X 100 10161 / 22617 X 100 44.93% Activity Ratios: Primary Activity Ratios: Debtor Turnover Ratio: Net credit sales / Avg. Debtors 41121 / 5617 7.32 Note: All the sales are assumed as credit sales Inventory Turnover Ratio: CGS / Avg. Inventory 27742 / 1611 17.22 Asset Turnover Ratio: Sales / avg. total assets 41121 / 22534.5 1.81 Supplementary Activity Ratios Avg. Collection Period: 365 / Debtors turnover ratio 365 / 7.32 49.86 ~ 50 days Inventory Conversion Period: 365 / Inventory turnover ratio 365 / 17.22 21.19~ 22 days Ratio Analysis: Sn Ratios 2008 2007 2006 01 Current ratio 120% 154.37% 182.90% 02 Absolute Liquid Ratio 33.50% 36.10% 84.02% 03 Quick ratio 107.80% 139.23% 167.62% 04 GP Margin Ratio 34.26% 33.90% 32.54% 05 Net Profit to net sales ratio 9.80% 16.20% 13.92% 06 Earning Per Share Ratio 3.988 per share 8.268 per share 4.366 per share 07 Debt to Total Asset Ratio 51.42% 50.47% 44.93% 08 Debtor turnover ratio 4.91 5.97 7.32 09 Avg. Collection Period 74.33 days 61.13 days 49.86 days 10 Inventory Conversion Period 29.62 days 23.9 days 21.19 days 11 Inventory turnover Ratio 12.32 15.27 17.22 12 Asset turnover Ratio 0.21 1.7 1.81 The current ratio of the company shows that company have enough current assets to repay its all the current liabilities which shows that company is in good condition but not enough good as it was in 2007 and 2006. The absolute liquid ratio shows that company has 34.26% highly liquid assets to repay its current liabilities. This shows bad impact of the company. Although company has more liquid assets in 2006 and 2007 to clear its liabilities this shows that companys performance is going worse day by day. The quick ratio shows that company have enough funds available to repay its current liabilities. This is good sign for investors. But as we compare it with ratios of previous two years it shows that it is also decreasing. Company has not enough funds available as they were available in 2006-07. The GP margin ratio shows that our gross profit is 34.26% of total sales. This is increasing with the increase of sales. As we compare GP margin ratio of last three years, we see that GP margin is in very good in 2008. This attracts the investors. The NP to Net Sales ratio shows that the margin of net profit of total sales is 9.8% is quiet low as compared to previous two years. This shows that company has increased it administrative and marketing expenses this year. The share holders of the company are not getting enough earning this year as much as they have earned in previous years. This makes investors to withdraw their investment from business. And business goes down without having investment. The Debts to total assets shows that the company has 2 assets to repay its 1 Liability or debts. The company is in good position to clear its debts. As we compare it with past two years the company was in better condition. Company increased it debts this year. The debtor turnover ratio shows that we have made 4.91 times credit sales than avg. debtors. In past years company made more credit sales than this year. It means company prefer to make more cash sales. The avg. collection period shows that company recovers debts from customers in 74.33 days. As we compare this with last two years than we come to know that company recovered its debts in fewer periods than this. It means co mpany made soft debts recovery policies. The inventory conversion period shows that company converts it stock/inventory into sales in 29.62 days. But in previous years company took 23.9 days and 21.19 days to convert its stock into sales. This year company took more time for conversion into sales. This means that company policies need urgent attention. Accounting Ratios for Samsung Corporation Ltd For the year 2008 Liquidity Ratios: Current Ratio: Current Assets / Current Liabilities X 100 193728 / 106617 X 100 181.7% Absolute Liquid Ratio: Cash + cash Equivalents / Current Liabilities X 100 91087 / 106617 X 100 85.43% Quick (Acid Test) Ratio: Current Assets inventories / Current Liabilities X 100 191756 / 106617 X 100 179.85% Profitability Ratios: GP Margin Ratio: Sales CGS / Sales X 100 266056 / 298934 X 100 89% Net Profit to Net Sales Ratio: Net Profit / Net Sales X 100 63189 / 298934 X100 21.14% Earnings Per Share Ratio: Net Profit Payable / Number of shares 43592 / 1000 43.592 Per share Solvency (Coverage) Ratios Debt to Total Asset Ratio Total Debts / Total Assets X 100 107840 / 848183 X 100 12.71% Activity Ratios: Primary Activity Ratios: Debtor Turnover Ratio: Net credit sales / Avg. Debtors 298934 / 72573 4.12 Note: All the sales are assumed as credit sales Inventory turnover Ratio: CGS / Avg. Inventory 32878 / 2155.5 15.25 Asset turnover Ratio: Sales / avg. total assets 298934 / 745563.5 0.401 Supplementary Activity Ratios: Avg. Collection Period: 365 / Debtors turnover ratio 365 / 4.12 88.59 days Inventory Conversion Period: 365 / Inventory turnover ratio 365 / 15.25 23.93 days Accounting Ratios for Siemens For the year 2008 Liquidity Ratios: Current Ratio: Current Assets / Current Liabilities X 100 43242 / 42451 X 100 101.9% Absolute Liquid Ratio: Cash + cash Equivalents / Current Liabilities X 100 6893 / 42451X 100 16.24% Quick (Acid Test) Ratio: Current Assets inventories / Current Liabilities X 100 28733 / 42451 X 100 67.69% Profitability Ratios: GP Margin Ratio: Sales CGS / Sales X 100 21043 / 77327 X 100 27.21% Net Profit to Net Sales Ratio: Net Profit / Net Sales X 100 5886 / 77327 X100 7.61% Earnings Per Share Ratio: Net Profit Payable / Number of shares 5886 / 1000 5.886 Per share Solvency (Coverage) Ratios: Debt to Total Asset Ratio: Total Debts / Total Assets X 100 67083 / 94463 X 100 71.02% Activity Ratios: Primary Activity Ratios: Debtor Turnover Ratio: Net credit sales / Avg. Debtors 77327 / 15202.5 5.09 Note: All the sales are assumed as credit sales Inventory Turnover Ratio: CGS / Avg. Inventory 56284 / 13719.5 4.1 Asset Turnover Ratio: Sales / avg. total assets 77327 / 93009 0.83 Supplementary Activity Ratios: Avg. Collection Period: 365 / Debtors turnover ratio 365 / 5.09 71.71 days Inventory Conversion Period: 365 / Inventory turnover ratio 365 / 4.1 89.02 days Ratio Analysis of Nokia, Samsung and Siemens: S/N Ratios Nokia Samsung Siemens 00 Year 2008 2008 2008 01 Current ratio 120% 181.7% 101.9% 02 Absolute Liquid Ratio 33.50% 85.43% 16.24% 03 Quick ratio 107.80% 179.85% 67.69% 04 GP Margin Ratio 34.26% 89% 27.21% 05 Net Profit to net sales ratio 9.80% 21.14% 7.61% 06 Earning Per Share Ratio 3.988 per share 43.592 per share 5.886 per share 07 Debt to Total Asset Ratio 51.42% 12.71% 71.02% 08 Debtor turnover ratio 4.91 4.12 5.09 09 Avg. Collection Period 74.33 days 88.59 days 71.71 days 10 Inventory Conversion Period 29.62 days 23.93 days 89.02 days 11 Inventory turnover Ratio 12.32 15.25 4.1 12 Asset turnover Ratio 0.21 0.401 0.83 As we compare the quick ratio of the nokia we can analyze that the company is more stable then the siemens but when we compare it to Samsung we can see that Samsung is more stable then nokia. Similarly as Absolute liquid ratio of t he nokia is also less then the Samsung but it is grater then the siemens that means the company has absolute liquid assets greater then the siemens but less then the Samsung to pay off its current liabilities Same situation is with the Quick, G.P Margin Ratio and Net Profit to Sale Ratio in Nokia, It has good performance then the siemens but as we compare it to the Samsung. Samsung is more stable then nokia company due to various reasons The share holders of Samsung earn more than of Nokias and Siemens. This attracts investors to invest in Samsung rather than other two companies. Debts to total assets ratio shows that nokia has 51% of debts of its total assets. While Samsung has 12.71% and Siemens have 71% debts of its total assets. The Debts to Total assets ratio of Samsung is better than other twos. Nokia recovers its accounts receivables from its debtors in about 75 days while Samsung and Siemens recovers in 89 and 72 two days consecutively. The company should recover its receivables from its debtors in minimum period of time so that it can utilize its cash more effectively and efficiently. The above comparison shows that Siemens recovers its receivables in minimum time of 72 days. Samsung its stock into sales in 24 days while Nokia and Siemens put their stock into sales in 30 and 89 days. A company, having shorter inventory conversion period increases its sales and utilize its resources efficiently, is ideal company. Importance: Investment is life blood of a business. A business can never survive without appropriate investment/funding. Investment: (Options) Establishment of new Business: An investor has an option of investment in starting a new business. He can start new business to earn profit. He can utilize his experience to run business efficiently. Purchase of an Existing Business: An investor can also purchase an existing business. He can do so on analyzing companies past annual reports and he also forecast standing of business in near future. Investment in Shares of a Business: An investor has an option of investment in shares of existing listed companies. He can compare some different companies annual reports and take decision on making investment in shares. Merging of Business: Investors can investment in expansion of business in such a way to overcome on another same or different type of business. There are two types of merging of a business. Horizontal Merging into same type of business is called horizontal type of merging. Vertical Merging into different type of business is called vertical type of merging. Amalgamation of Business: Investors have an option of investment in amalgamation of one business into another. One business can amalgamate another business Advancement of Loans: An investor can advance loan to business on agreed terms. Performance Audit An audit performed by an asset manager from outside of the business to verify the performance shown in financial statements of the business. Forecasting using Regression Line Method: N X Y XY X2 1 5 34191 170955 25 2 6 41121 246726 36 3 7 51058 357406 49 4 8 50710 405680 64 ÃÆ' ¢Ãƒâ€¹Ã¢â‚¬  Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å" 26 177080 1180767 174 Here X = Year Y = Sales Y = a + b X a = ÃÆ' ¢Ãƒâ€¹Ã¢â‚¬  Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"X2 ÃÆ' ¢Ãƒâ€¹Ã¢â‚¬  Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"Y ÃÆ' ¢Ãƒâ€¹Ã¢â‚¬  Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"X ÃÆ' ¢Ãƒâ€¹Ã¢â‚¬  Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"XY n ÃÆ' ¢Ãƒâ€¹Ã¢â‚¬  Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"X2 ÃÆ' ¢Ãƒâ€¹Ã¢â‚¬  Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å" (X) 2 a = (174) (177080) (26) (1180767) 4(174) (26) a = 30811920 3069942 696 676 a = 111978 20 a = 5598.9 b = n ÃÆ' ¢Ãƒâ€¹Ã¢â‚¬  Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"XY -ÃÆ' ¢Ãƒâ€¹Ã¢â‚¬  Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"X ÃÆ' ¢Ãƒâ€¹Ã¢â‚¬  Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"Y n ÃÆ' ¢Ãƒâ€¹Ã¢â‚¬  Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"X2 ÃÆ' ¢Ãƒâ€¹Ã¢â‚¬  Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å" (X) 2 b = (4) (1180767) (26) (177080) 4(174) (26) a = 4723068 4604080 696 676 a = 118988 20 a = 5949.4 a = 5598.9 b = 5949.4 Y = a + b X Y = 5598.9 + 5949.4 X Y = 5598.9 + 5949.4 (9) 9 = 59143.5 Y = 5598.9 + 5949.4 (10) 10 = 65092.0 Sales for the year 2009 is expected to increase. Graphical Representation Vision of the future Connecting people is now connecting people to what matters whatever that means for each person giving them the power to make the most of every moment, everywhere, any time. Connecting the we is more powerful than just the individual. Thats how Nokia is needed to help make the world a better place for everyone. Strategy To do this we will become the leading provider of mobile solutions. Our solutions strategy leverages one of our greatest assets a portfolio of outstanding devices, with unmatched scale and geographic reach. We couple them with smart services, integrated via an intuitive and seamless user experience. We differentiate these solutions offerings based on our in-depth consumer understanding, with a strong focus on social location (people and places). In a world where connecting people to what matters, empowers them to make the most of every moment. Our ambition is to become the leading provider of mobile solutions

Transformation in Heart of Darkness and Apocalypse Now Essay

Transformation in Heart of Darkness and Apocalypse Now Since Francis Ford Coppola’s Apocalypse Now was based on Joseph Conrads novel, Heart of Darkness, it is possible to draw many parallels between the two works. Both can be interpreted as metaphors for a journey through the inner self, and each has its own particular message to convey. In many ways they also appear to have similarities to Arthurian Legend, in particular the quest for the holy grail, and other allegorical journey narratives. The sum of the experiences of the protagonists, Marlow in Heart of Darkness and Willard in Apocalypse Now, reveal to them how the horrors and effects of war or conquest, can lead some people to madness, while other persons may discover†¦show more content†¦The initial goals of each protagonist becomes altered during the course of their journeys. From the outset of the novel, Marlow is depicted as being not typical (Conrad p. 9), he is a wandering type of person. It is portrayed as if Marlow does not have a home, and it seems as if h e had a bond [to] the sea (Conrad p.1). This may lead to an interpretation that he attempts to find out more about himself, and discover his inner character. The re-appearing image of the winding river resembles a journey from a wild uncivilized world, towards the light. In Heart of Darkness when Marlow finds out along the way that Kurtz, the manager of the Inner Station is gravely ill, Marlow turns his attention on reaching Kurtz in time to aid in his recovery. In Apocalypse Now, as Willard ventures with his crew through the Nung River, he witnesses atrocities committed against fellow humans. Although his mission at the beginning was clearly stated as an extermination, Willard takes along Kurtzs military dossier and analyzes Kurtzs remarkable military career. Willard develops an interest and apparent admiration for Kurtz. A striking similarity in both works is the fact that the antagonist Kurtz has managed to set up a corrupt enclave in which the natives revere Kurtz as their god-l ike leader. There are manyShow MoreRelated Apocalypse Now vs Heart of Darkness Essay1120 Words   |  5 Pages Francis Ford Coppola’s Apocalypse Now lacks the impact of its inspiration, Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness. While the basic elements of imperialism and human nature remain intact, the characters of the film bare little resemblance to their literary counterparts. The film serves as a re-interpretation of Conrad’s novella, updated from 19th-century British imperialism in the Congo to a critique of 20th-century U.S. imperialism in Southeast Asia. Coppola’s changes in setting and plot structure, howeverRead MoreHeart Of Darkness By Joseph Conrad And The Film Apocalypse Now2143 Words   |  9 Pagesand altogether brutal is what describes â€Å"Heart of Darkness† by Joseph Conrad and the film adaption Apocalypse Now by Francis Ford Coppola. A short novella published in 1899, â€Å"Heart of Darkness† centers on the journey taken by the narrator Mar low up the Congo River with a Belgian trading company. Upriver he encounters the mysterious ivory trader, Kurtz and is brought face to face with corruption and despair. Set in the Vietnam War, the film Apocalypse Now follows the central character, U.S. Army specialRead More Comparing Conrads Heart of Darkness and Coppolas Apocalypse Now3622 Words   |  15 PagesSimilarities in Conrads Heart of Darkness and Coppolas Apocalypse Now Sometimes, a work is so great that artists from other forms of expression are compelled to interpret that work in their own medium. Francis Ford Coppola took James Conrad’s classic novel Heart of Darkness and updated it to the time of the Vietnam War. James Conrad’s classic novella Heart of Darkness is a tale about a seaman who makes his way up the Congo river in search of a man and his ivory. In 1979, Francis Ford CoppolaRead More Comparing Mary Anne in Sweetheart of the Song Tra Bong and Kurtz in Apocalypse Now2602 Words   |  11 PagesComparing Mary Anne in Sweetheart of the Song Tra Bong and Kurtz in Apocalypse Now  Ã‚     Ã‚  Ã‚   In 1979, Francis Coppola released a film that he said he hoped would give its audience a sense of the horror, the madness, the sensuousness, and the moral dilemma of the Vietnam war (as quoted in Hagen 230). His film, Apocalypse Now, based on Joseph Conrads 1902 novel Heart of Darkness, is the story of Captain Benjamin Willards (Martin Sheen) journey to the interior of the jungle of Southeastern AsiaRead MoreHow to Read Lit Like a Prof Notes3608 Words   |  15 Pagesindirectly c. Symbolic Vampirism: selfishness, exploitation, refusal to respect the autonomy of other people, using people to get what we want, placing our desires, particularly ugly ones, above the needs of another. 4. If It’s Square, It’s a Sonnet 5. Now, Where Have I Seen Her Before? a. There is no such thing as a wholly original work of literature—stories grow out of other stories, poems out of other poems. b. There is only one story—of humanity and human nature, endlessly repeated c. â€Å"Intertexuality†Ã¢â‚¬â€recognizingRead MoreEssay on Media Violence Does NOT Cause Violent Behavior2932 Words   |  12 Pages In myths, rape, incest, all manner of gruesome bloodshed, child abandonment, and total debauchery are standard fare. We see more of the same in Bible stories, accentuated with dire predictions of terrors and abominations in an end of the world apocalypse that is more horrifying than the human imagination can even grasp. For the most part, these images of violence, promiscuity and human degradation are explained away by psychologists, mythologists, sociologists, philosophers, and non-fundamentalistRead MoreOne Significant Change That Has Occurred in the World Between 1900 and 2005. Explain the Impact This Change Has Made on Our Lives and Why It Is an Important Change.163893 Words   |  656 Pages†¢ INTRODUCTION contributions by Jose Moya and Adam McKeown and Howard Spodek consider in nuanced detail key developments in transport and communication technologies, demographic trends, and socioeconomic shifts that represented watershed transformations in where humans lived, how they earned their livings, and their unprecedented ability to move about the globe. Moya and McKeown set the patterns of migration in the twentieth century against those extending back millennia, and they compare inRead MoreProject Mgmt296381 Words   |  1186 PagesProject Management Body of Knowledge (2008). †¢ Revised Chapter 14 to include project retrospectives. Chapters 2, 4, 6, 7, and 12, have been updated. †¢ New student exercises and cases have been added to most chapters. †¢ Answers to selected exercises are now available in Appendix 1 †¢ A third major computer exercise has been added to the Appendix 2; †¢ The â€Å"Snapshot from Practice† boxes feature a number of new examples of project management in action as well as new research highlights that continue to promote

The Robin Hood Tax †Summary Free Essays

Business Tax: Reading Week Notes The Robin Hood Tax * The idea behind the RHT is to generate hundreds of billions of dollars * That money could be used to kick-start the US economy and get America back on its feet * The RHT = 0. 5% tax on Wall Street transactions * Benefits: * It won’t affect the vast majority of Americans * It’s easy to enforce * It’s tough to evade * It taxes those who are to blame for the global financial crisis, rather than the average American * It will help limit riskless speculation that threatens financial stability The RHT is seen as justified as â€Å"the banks can afford it† * â€Å"It’s not a tax ON the people, it’s a tax FOR the people† * It will be implemented using a Financial Speculation (or Transaction) Tax (FST/FTT) * The FST is a small tax of less than half a percent on trades in derivatives, stocks, bonds and foreign currency * With an FTT, a small percent (between 0. 005% and 0. We will write a custom essay sample on The Robin Hood Tax – Summary or any similar topic only for you Order Now 5%) of the value of the trade is collected in tax revenue The tax will deter the most risky transactions and prevent some of the â€Å"gambling† which helped trigger the financial crisis * Why is the RHT needed? The financial crisis has left a massive hole in the US’s public finances and this needs to be filled. The money raised will generate jobs and strengthen public services * The money can also be used to fund new Green projects to help curb global climate change * Disadvantages The article is incredibly biased so it downplays this point: the tax will affect regular investors as well which could discourage normal people from investing * The tax will affect the value of pension funds, possibly discouraging trading which would see the value of pensions of many normal American’s fall * Banks may just past the cost of this tax onto the consumer * The affected companies may just move their business offshore or start trying to avoid other types of taxes * The tax could alter dealings between US firms and other foreign firms. For example, foreign firms will be less likely to invest in the US markets * Overall that article was disgustingly bias but it does make a good point of taxing those who have the money and those who have put America (and the rest of the world) in the global financial mess its currently in * The RHT is also sometimes incorrectly called the ‘Tobin Tax’. The Tobin Tax is basically the RHT except it focuses solely on taxing financial taxation between countries to reduce rapid foreign investment PAYE System Benefits| | Disadvantages| Simple| | Lack of accuracy| Provides real-time information to the government| | Reliance on Tax codes| Unavoidable| | No P45 form| Reduced the tax forms for employees| | Does not include Benefits in Kind (BIK)| No bad debt| | HMRC mistakes| Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme Benefits| | Disadvantages| Incentives for businesses to become environmentally friendly| | How many permits do you issue? What is the upper limit of pollution? Who decides? Reduces carbon emissions| | Low emission companies will have no incentive to reduce emissions further| Tax revenue for government| | Complicated system| Incentivises businesses to look for more environmentally friendly fuel sources innovation| | Inconsistent system| | | Higher costs for businesses passed onto consumers? | UK VAT System Benefits| Disadvantages| Difficult to avoid| Costly to implement| Simple| Users must be ‘tax savvy’| VAT is transparent| Regressive tax| Price does not increase when VAT is added| VAT is inflationary| Fairness| | Huge tax revenue for government| | VAT may be selectively applied| | Cheap admin costs for HMRC| | More efficient tool for macroeconomic policy than income taxes| | VAT charged on sale VAT charged on sale VAT paid on purchases VAT paid on purchases VAT Due VAT Due Input VAT Input VAT Output VAT Output VAT Exempt| Zero rated – 0%| Reduced rated – 5%| Standard Rated – 20%| Financial services| Cakes| Energy saving materials that are permanently installed (e. . loft insulation)| Too much to list| Insurance| Basic food| Mobility aids for the elderly| | Betting Gambling| First aid| Nicotine patches + gum| | Education| Books| Sanitary protection products| | Burials/cremations| Children’s clothes| Fuels| | | Public transport| Protective equipment e. g. baby car seats| | | Books + Newspapers| | | The supply is taxable Can reclaim ALL input tax paid The supply is taxable Can reclaim ALL inp ut tax paid How to cite The Robin Hood Tax – Summary, Papers